Content modeling and governance
Use the evidence to set priorities and acceptance criteria before choosing implementation details.
Sanity CMS
Give editors a content system shaped around reusable meaning, market-specific publishing, live preview, and the workflows the organization uses.

The core decision
We model entities and relationships, define validation and ownership, and keep presentation concerns out of reusable content so channels and markets can evolve independently.
Tenten perspective
What creates pressure
Use the evidence to set priorities and acceptance criteria before choosing implementation details.
Translate the finding into a clear operating decision, an owner, and a measurable review point.
Keep the decision visible through design, engineering, launch, and the first optimization cycle.
Decision chapter 01
We model entities and relationships, define validation and ownership, and keep presentation concerns out of reusable content so channels and markets can evolve independently.
Use the evidence to set priorities and acceptance criteria before choosing implementation details.
Translate the finding into a clear operating decision, an owner, and a measurable review point.
Keep the decision visible through design, engineering, launch, and the first optimization cycle.
Decision chapter 02
System boundaries, data ownership, environments, releases, monitoring, and recovery are part of the implementation so the stack remains operable.
Use the evidence to set priorities and acceptance criteria before choosing implementation details.
Translate the finding into a clear operating decision, an owner, and a measurable review point.
Keep the decision visible through design, engineering, launch, and the first optimization cycle.
What the evidence changes
System boundaries, data ownership, environments, releases, monitoring, and recovery are part of the implementation so the stack remains operable.

What the evidence changes
We begin with the commercial and operational constraint, align the experience and architecture, then ship in reviewable increments. The team that frames the problem remains accountable through launch.

Tenten perspective
A flexible schema still needs clear governance.
Define the decision, dependencies, and proof required before work moves into production.
Design with real content and operating constraints so the experience can survive launch.
Build explicit system boundaries, release ownership, and maintainable implementation paths.
Validate the result and leave the team with a practical next operating cycle.
Map the business decision, current constraints, dependencies, and acceptance evidence.
Agree on the target journey, system ownership, data boundaries, and implementation scope.
Prototype with real content and validate the highest-risk journeys before full production.
Implement, integrate, and test the system with observable quality gates.
Tenten perspective
We begin with the business decision, current-state constraints, target operating model, and evidence required for acceptance. The scope follows those findings.
Yes. We document system and decision ownership early so internal teams and specialist partners can work without ambiguous handoffs.
We tie scope to the decisions, dependencies, and acceptance evidence agreed at the start, then record changes rather than hiding them inside delivery.
The first operating cycle reviews performance, user behavior, content needs, and unresolved risks so the next iteration starts from evidence.
Related paths
Start with the real constraint
Bring the market, platform, and operating questions. We will help define the evidence, scope, and next step.